What
is battery?
Battery is the criminal
offence whereby one party makes unlawful physical contact with another party
with the intention to cause harm. This offence has not been mentioned in the
Kenyan Penal Code. The closest reference to battery in the Penal Code is under
section 251 which states:
“Any person who commits an assault
occasioning actual bodily harm is guilty of a misdemeanour and is liable to
imprisonment or five years.”
Under common law the
offence of battery was considered a misdemeanor but there are special
circumstances where this offence would be considered as a felony. Such
circumstances would include aggravated battery whereby there is use of a weapon
for example.
Elements
of the offence of battery
The prosecution in this
case would have to prove the following elements beyond reasonable doubt;
1. Unlawful/Unauthorized
application of force
The force need not be
severe, even minimal application of force or contact will satisfy the
requirement. Also, the victim must not have consented to the act, such consent
negates this element.
2. The act must be
done to another person
3. The act must result
in harmful or offensive contact.
This requirement may be
substituted with the statement; actual bodily harm
In the case of R V Miller, (case of rape during
separation that was covered by marital consent) the court charged the defendant
with assault and battery defining actual bodily harm as; “any hurt or injury
calculated to interfere with health or comfort of the victim”
4. The mens rea
required is intention or recklessness
Some examples of cases
involving battery are
R
v Woolin [1998] which defined intent in criminal law
R
v Venna [1975] stated recklessness is sufficient when
coupled with the actus reus of physical contact to bring about liability
Assaults
on persons protecting a wreck
Section 252 of the
Penal Code states that:
“Any
person who assaults and strikes or wounds any magistrate, officer or other
person lawfully authorized in
or on account of the execution of his duty in or concerning the preservation of
any vessel in distress, or of any vessel or goods or effects wrecked, stranded
or cast on shore, or lying under water, is guilty of a misdemeanour and is
liable to imprisonment for seven years.”
Assaulting,
Resisting and Obstructing a Police Officer
Assault on a police
officer, or APO, is a criminal offense that can be charged as either a
misdemeanor or felony, depending on the severity of the offense. However there
are certain requirements:
1) Officer
must be on duty
S 253(a) of the Penal
Code states that it is a serious offence to assault a police officer who is
executing his duty. Section253 (b) goes ahead to state that it is an offence to
resist a lawful arrest. These sections cover persons acting in aid of
policemen. They however do not apply to officers off duty
Some examples of cases
stating about a police officer on duty are:
Rex
v Wakaba s/o Waithaka
Rex
v Nganga s/o Kanja and another
2) Knowledge
that Officer is on Duty is irrelevant
In the case of assault
on a policeman while on duty, the fact that the person committing the act did
not know that they were policemen and were executing their duty is immaterial. Assaulting
a police officer is a crime and if done the person cannot escape criminal
liability just because they did not know the assaulted is a police officer in
the course of duty (Section 253 b)
In the case of Waera
s/o Madoya and others V Republic, a police constable and police driver in
normal clothes were accompanied by two civilians and they entered the house
belonging to one of the appellants looking for a stolen bicycle and they found
it and when they found it they saw a radio which they were also interested in. The
appellant became suspicious and raised an alarm since he thought the police
were masquerading as a police party. Other appellants came and attacked the
police. The constable escaped, others were tied up and taken to a police post.
The appellants were later arrested for assaulting police and convicted. The
conviction was quashed since the appellants honestly believed the police were
masquerading as a police party for unlawful purposes
Therefore if there are
honest reasonable grounds to believe that the person assaulted was not a
police, the person cannot be convicted due to the defence of mistake of fact
OBSTRUCTING
A POLICE OFFICER
THE
DEFINITION
Obstruction is the act
of taking action in order to prevent something from happening.
Section 253 (b) of the
Penal Code: it is an offence to obstruct a police officer in the due execution
of his duties
Section 108 of the
Kenya Defence Forces Act states that it is an offence to obstruct a police
officer
The following are seen
as examples of obstruction;
·
Resisting arrest
·
Running and hiding from a law
enforcement officer.
The crime of
obstruction can be a felony or misdemeanor. It depends on the severity of the
actions of the person being arrested.
ELEMENTS
OF OBSTRUCTION
The defendant
intentionally resisted or obstructed a law enforcement officer. However, the
person need not have intended the result or harm.
The defendant acted
violently toward the officer or threatened to act violently e.g. striking or
pushing
The law enforcement
officer was lawfully discharging his official duties e.g. investigating a crime
or making a traffic stop
THE
OFFICER MUST BE EXECUTING DUTY
The offence of
obstruction is only established if the officer was in the process of executing
the duties.
Some cases are:
Marijani v Uganda
(1967) EA 111 ( sir Udo Udoma CJ)
Lai v Republic (1970)
EA 257
Isaac s/o Reuben v The
Queen (1953-57) 2 TLR
DEFENCES TO THE OFFENCE
Some defences to the
offence are:
·
Self-defense. If the arresting officer
acts violently and is no justified in doing so, the arrestee may protect
himself and resist arrest
·
Unlawful arrest. This is an arrest that
is not authorized by law, such as an arrest without a warrant or probable
cause.
RESISTING ARREST
Definition
Resisting arrest occurs
when a person interferes with a law enforcement officer’s attempt to perform a
lawful arrest.
Who
can be said to resist arrest?
Section 253(b) Penal
code any person who assaults, resists or wilfully obstructs any police officer
in due execution of his duty, or any person acting in aid of that officer.
What
does resisting arrest constitute?
It includes the
following acts:
·
Fleeing a police officer while being
arrested
·
Threatening a police officer while being
arrested
·
Physically struggling to get out from
being arrested
·
Attacking a police officer while being
arrested
Lui
v Republic
The appellant refused
to leave the dock when ordered to do so by the court. He resisted removal and
created a disturbance which interrupted court business. He was convicted of
other things including resisting arrest.
On appeal the
conviction relating to resisting arrest was quashed.
It was held that the
appellant was at the material time in custody, and he had been remanded in
custody. He did not seek to escape from custody, all he did was refuse to leave
the court and force had to be used to remove him while in custody from one
place to another. His conduct could not be described as resisting arrest.
Paulo
s/o Busondo and another v Reginam
Where an accused person
is charged with acts intended to prevent arrest he may be convicted of the
offence of willfully obstructing a police officer in execution of his duty.
Reason : The cognate
element between the two offences is the intention to resist lawful arrest and
the latter is a minor offence of the former.
Note
Section
21(2) Criminal Procedure Code states that if a suspect resists arrest ,the
police officer may use all means necessary to effect the arrest.
If one is not forcibly resisting arrest, the
force used by the police to arrest the suspect will be different with when
arresting a suspect trying to evade arrest.
Reasonable
force is measured against the kind of resistance that a person is demonstrating
against the police.
By Llb 2013 intake students at Riara University
By Llb 2013 intake students at Riara University
No comments:
Post a Comment